ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide since its discovery in December 2019. Research published since the COVID-19 outbreak has focused on whether semen quality and reproductive hormone levels are affected by COVID-19. However, there is limited evidence on semen quality of uninfected men. This study aimed to compare semen parameters among uninfected Chinese sperm donors before and after the COVID-19 pandemic to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic-related stress and lifestyle changes on uninfected men. RESULTS: All semen parameters were non-significant except semen volume. The average age of sperm donors was higher after the COVID-19 (all P < 0.05). The average age of qualified sperm donors increased from 25.9 (SD: 5.3) to 27.6 (SD: 6.0) years. Before the COVID-19, 45.0% qualified sperm donors were students, but after the COVID-19, 52.9% were physical laborers (P < 0.05). The proportion of qualified sperm donors with a college education dropped from 80.8 to 64.4% after the COVID-19 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although the sociodemographic characteristics of sperm donors changed after the COVID-19 pandemic, no decline in semen quality was found. There is no concern about the quality of cryopreserved semen in human sperm banks after the COVID-19 pandemic.
RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La maladie due au Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) s'est propagée rapidement dans le monde entier depuis sa découverte en décembre 2019. Les recherches publiées depuis l'éclosion de la COVID-19 se sont concentrées sur la question de savoir si la qualité du sperme et les niveaux d'hormones reproductives étaient affectés par la COVID-19. Il existe, cependant, peu de preuves sur la qualité du sperme des hommes non infectés. Cette étude visait à comparer, avant et après la pandémie de COVID-19, les paramètres du sperme chez les donneurs de sperme Chinois non infectés, afin de déterminer l'impact du stress lié à la pandémie de COVID-19 et aux changements de mode de vie sur les hommes non infectés. RéSULTATS: Toutes les valeurs des paramètres du sperme étaient non significatives, à l'exception du volume de sperme. L'âge moyen des donneurs de sperme était plus élevé après la COVID-19 (tous p < 0,05). L'âge moyen des donneurs de sperme admissibles est passé de 25,9 ans (ET : 5,3) à 27,6 ans (ET : 6,0). Avant la COVID-19, 45 % des donneurs de sperme admissibles étaient des étudiants, mais après la COVID-19, 53 % étaient des travailleurs physiques (p < 0,05). La proportion de donneurs de sperme admissibles ayant fait des études secondaires est passée de 80,8 % à 64,4 % après la COVID-19 (p < 0,05). CONCLUSION: Bien que les caractéristiques sociodémographiques des donneurs de sperme aient changé après la pandémie de COVID-19, aucune baisse de la qualité du sperme n'a été constatée. Il n'y a aucune préoccupation quant à la qualité du sperme cryoconservé dans les banques de sperme humain après la pandémie de COVID-19. MOTS-CLéS: COVID-19, Qualité du Sperme, Donneur de Sperme, Banque de Sperme humain.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The effects of SARS-CoV-2 were initially studied in the respiratory system, but research has now shown manifestations in multiple organ systems. SARS-CoV-2 is known to enter target cells through the ACE- 2 receptor, which is expressed in the testes. Due to this, the testes has been purported to be a potential target for SARS-CoV-2 infection. To date, studies have suggested that there is only a minor risk for shedding of SARS-CoV-2 into the semen.1 The objective of this study is to compare semen analysis parameters in a subset of healthy sperm donors prior to, during, and after testing positive for COVID-19. MATERIALSAND METHODS: The study included semen analyses (SA) from qualified sperm donors aged 19-38, with 2-5 days of abstinence who donated sperm prior to COVID infection, during active COVID infection, and post COVID infection. Semen was collected in the course of sperm bank operation and samples were collected concurrent with incidental positive test results obtained through COVID screening. Primary outcomes included ejaculate volume (mL), average concentration (M/mL), and percent motility (%). The standard operating procedure for sperm donation dictated that morphology is performed when they are first accepted into the program, thus was not recorded for these samples. Data were compared and analyzed by ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of five qualified sperm donors met inclusion criteria for this study. When comparing semen analyses across the three time points, there was not a significant difference in concentration (p=0.7460), percent motility (p=0.9135), or ejaculate volume (p=0.9241) [Table 1]. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm quality measures as evidenced in qualified, healthy sperm donors are not significantly different when comparing sperm samples prior to COVID infection, during active COVID infection, and after recovery from COVID infection. Although limited by a small sample size, our findings are reassuring to those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, as there appears to be no adverse association with sperm quality. IMPACT STATEMENT: Sperm quality in healthy, qualified donors is not affected by active SARS-CoV-2 infection.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that geographic variations in environmental toxins may impact sperm quality. Previously, we published findings that demonstrated a decline in sperm quality over an eleven year period across six regions of the United States (US).1 The current study investigates whether there was a decrease in sperm quality from a diverse set of US sperm donors across six regions in the US over a sixteen year period. Additionally, this study sought to evaluate changes between semen analysis (SA) parameters in an era of sperm collection during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semen analyses (SA) from sperm donors aged 19-38, with 2-5 days abstinence, from 9 different geographic regions from January 2005-April 2021 were examined. The sperm donors originated from one of the following regions: Palo Alto, Los Angeles, Westwood, International Nordic Cryo Bank Denmark, Indianapolis, Cambridge, New York, Houston, and Spokane, WA. Donation date, BMI, and geographic region were recorded. Data was analyzed as a whole as well as by individual region. Primary outcomes were ejaculate volume (mL), average concentration (M/mL), motility (%), and total motile count (M). Data was analyzed using a general estimate equation (GEE) model with an exchangeable working correlation structure to account for repeated measures. RESULTS: A total of 176,706 SA specimens (from 3,532 unique donors) were analyzed. Controlling for BMI, there was a significant decline in average concentration (M/mL) (β=-1.89, p<0.0001), sperm motility (%) (β=-0.2892, p<0.0001) and total motile sperm (M) (β=-4.53, p<0.0001) over the 16-year study period. There were significant decreases in SA parameters within all geographic regions (Spokane only had two unique donors and could not be examined). Indianapolis showed a significant decrease in sperm concentration and total motile sperm, but also displayed an increase in sperm motility over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Time related decline in sperm quality continues to be evident at a national level in young, healthy sperm donors. There was a decline across all geographic regions in all parameters except for ejaculate volume. How this decline in sperm counts impacts fertility has yet to be determined. Our modern environment involves increased exposures to endocrine disruptors and changes to lifestyle (including smoking, diet, and stress) that are postulated to impair male fertility by interfering with spermatogenesis. While a causative link to these risk factors remains to be elucidated further studies are necessary to evaluate whether this temporal decline in sperm count correlates with decreased fecundity. IMPACT STATEMENT: Sperm concentration, motility, and total motile sperm continue to decline across young, healthy sperm donors across the continental United States.